2026-02-20 15:43 UTC
Replies (33)
-
@magnetosphere@fedia.io 2026-02-20 16:19
Choads. All of them.
-
@frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 2026-02-20 17:26
Wow, they are all in on this psycho bullshit aren't they
-
@devolution@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 16:01
Scolding without jailtime = slap on wrist.
-
@eleijeep@piefed.social 2026-02-20 18:47
> Judge Carolyn Kuhl, who is presiding over the trial, ordered anyone in the courtroom wearing AI glasses to immediately remove them, noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned. > > "This is very serious," she said.
-
@hector@lemmy.today 2026-02-20 19:44
It's illegal to take photos and video in many courts, including all federal courts? Definitely one would need permission and can't do it surrepticiously. This is a slap in the face to the judge, and the courts, to flout their rules as if they were above them. And they were above them apparently, they didn't get held in contempt.
-
@Reygle@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 16:30
-
@megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-02-21 13:37
Gee, maybe there might be some practical, social and legal problems with always recording camera glasses…
-
@ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 2026-02-21 02:18
The sales of the glasses have been better than their VR headset which has really made them double down on the glasses as they see big potential. That said, I really think that it is a false hope as I suspect the market that is ok wearing Facebook glasses are small, but loyal.
-
@GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 20:27
This feels like gorilla marketing to me. They knew the judge would tell them to take them off and it would be just enough of a sensational story to make it to press. Now more people know that Meta has these glasses. Edit: I'm not changing it. The responses to my mistake are too funny
-
@whelk@retrolemmy.com 2026-02-21 01:40
Good grief. This is such a goofy time to be alive
-
@simulacra_procession@lemmy.today 2026-02-20 20:32
The return of the glassholes
-
@stoly@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 19:43
Step one being "make the judge mad" is a bad idea.
-
@anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2026-02-21 00:02
The fucking hubris. I’m so sick of it.
-
@BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2026-02-21 00:38
He put them in jail, right? RIGHT?
-
@Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2026-02-21 20:58
Social media platforms can now also offer witness intimidation/jury nullification services! It's a feature.
-
@BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2026-02-20 19:54
I always looked down on two party consent states, but now with the spyware glasses freaks? I'm less sure than ever. I mean, I think I should be legally allowed to punch people in the face breaking the glasses just for wearing them, but this isn't a just world~
-
@rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 2026-02-21 18:42
Scolds? That'll teach 'em...?
-
@h54@programming.dev 2026-02-20 16:42
That'll teach him.
-
@mracton@piefed.social 2026-02-20 18:31
Get ‘em, Judge! Eww. CBS is linking to Free Press articles. What next ABC News and Epoch News?!?
-
@MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2026-02-21 11:12
The face he makes here...
-
@Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-02-20 18:52
[Alternative](https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-courthouse-entourage-meta-ray-bans-addiction-trial-2026-2) to CBS.
-
@new_world_odor@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 19:40
So I need to preemptively wear anti facial recognition makeup if ever called for jury duty. Gotcha. It seems somewhat realistic to expect an actual punishment for this, even if not properly scaled. It's worth fighting for. But being prepared alongside that is important.
-
@baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2026-02-20 17:01
Never pass up an opportunity for getting in the news. Free advertising
-
@givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 15:52
>Zuckerberg was in court to testify as part of a trial over whether Meta and Alphabet-owned YouTube deliberately designed their social media platforms to encourage compulsive usage by young people. Ironically I think rather than them wearing them for nefarious reasons, they've just been encouraged to use them for so long, that they are actually addicted to them as well. Like, if you were forced to use your employers product at work for 10-12 hrs a day and try to come up with way to monetize it in your off hours, you may start to rely on it eventually. Our brains are wired to always take the easiest path, that's actually the reason for technological advancement in the first place. They probably just don't even realize they're wearing them, it's just a (mostly useless and completely impractical) part of their bodies now.
-
@Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-02-20 21:53
They said "Sorry."
-
@Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 21:27
Good call judge!
-
@NachBarcelona@piefed.social 2026-02-20 17:24
Now that they were scolded, much will change. Piece of shit post.
-
@grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 2026-02-20 17:02
Schmuckerburger
-
@totesmygoat@piefed.ca 2026-02-20 17:45
Wait, sorry for my ignorance. But wasn't this televised?
-
@hector@lemmy.today 2026-02-20 20:31
But we can't tell the difference between the "far left" and far right. The one is threatening to fix elections and have a madman in absolute power to use dishonest arguments to eliminate half the population and enslave developing countries, and the other wants not pay more money for less in by private trusts overcharging us, and doesn't think working people should get screwed without their consent, and wants equal rights for people, and believes in the tenants of the Bill of Rights. /s Can't tell you guys apart!
-
@Tetsuo@jlai.lu 2026-02-20 17:29
You are essentially saying the crowd has to do its own justice. It's a courtroom, not a voting booth.
-
@vogi@piefed.social 2026-02-20 17:59
It always amazes me how Microsoft is though. Stuff like Threads, Instagram, Facebook is incredibly evil but they still work?! I can at least understand why the majority of people who don't care are there. Microsofts products don't even work to begin with though. Everything they touch be it Xbox, Teams or Windows is just so bad i wonder how we even ended up here.
-
@Kissaki@feddit.org 2026-02-21 17:58
> No way of actually checking that they did delete anything Not a random individual, but I would expect a court to be able to do so. Hold them, get an expert, verify.