2026-02-20 18:47 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 19:46
Holy shit. Kudos to this judge for knowing their shit and acting on it. I love it.
-
@PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2026-02-20 20:40
Each and every individual should have been arrested then and there. Imagine walking into a major criminal trial with a film camera on your shoulder.
-
@Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2026-02-20 19:56
Isn't it usual procedure that everyone else enters the courtroom and takes their places before the judge walks in? So the team would have had ample opportunity to film, record and facially-recognize the jury before Judge Kuhl made them take off the spyglasses.
-
@JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2026-02-21 14:26
> noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned For that reason alone, she should have held them in contempt and declared a mistrial before wasting anyone else's time. Zuck and his crew should've been arrested on-site for such an egregious breach of privacy and mockery of the justice system. And the next set of jurors should've been immediately informed of why there was a mistrial, and the ***very obvious danger of the defendant having even one frame of video with a jurors face in it***. Instead, he got free viral marketing. What a fucking clownshow.
-
@PokerChips@programming.dev 2026-02-21 05:13
No charges?