2026-01-05 05:24 UTC
Wasn't there a bug that made XP unable to hit even 4GB, I seem to recall a limit of 3,5GB ram....
Replies (2)
-
@frongt@lemmy.zip 2026-01-05 06:41
Short answer, no, there were artificial limitations to ensure compatibility. Plenty of long-form answers if you care to search.
-
@Decq@lemmy.world 2026-01-05 09:24
It was 3.2GB and afaik it wasn't a bug, but 800MB was reserved for hardware IO