2026-02-13 13:18 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@lispi314@udongein.xyz 2026-02-13 23:35
@lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange Everything should be using key-addressed overlay networks. (Or just key-addressed networks, if GNUnet reaches completion at some point and is implemented in hardware, I suppose.) The notion that addressing a peer doesn't *inherently* mean the communication is encrypted is the problem. At that point, the notion "if I'm sending the message to a public room it's not private" and "if I'm sending a message to a specific person it's private" is very simple to grasp for users.
-
@MisuseCase@twit.social 2026-02-17 12:38
@lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange >> because as more and more time passes it more feels like a way to make people feel safer than they are, and weaken protocols. I don’t know about that, but it’s at the point where you can slap “E2EE” on something for branding purposes and people don’t think about other factors in secure software/services at all. Or what E2EE really means, for that matter. I don’t blame them though. Most people are not cybersecurity nerds, nor can they be.