Elektrine lite

← Feed

@IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world

2026-04-13 12:20 UTC

i find such rule to be inherently controlling and coercive. and used to punish abused and neglected partners who find affection elsewhere but can't leave their relationship due to coersion or fear of homelessness. Cheating like that should be like "we agreed were both in a diet, but I had a donut that someone brought to the office", not "you are inherently a horrible human being who deserves to be shamed and hated for seeking human connection".

Replies (2)

  • @KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2026-04-13 13:20

    If two parties agreed to it under no sense of duress then anyone who betrayed the mutual trust required is making a selfish choice. If your feelings toward the agreement change you need to have a discussion with the other person. You can say they're antiquated for agreeing to it, you can even say that it's an unrealistic expectation but if it's consensually agreed to it's about trust in your partner's word

    Open ##1161862

  • Then don't enter into relationships where that's a rule, or negotiate alternatives 🤷‍♂️ I'm not going to say there aren't circumstances where cheating is *understandable*, but it's still a bad thing to do, even in the scenario you describe. Taking the abused and neglected cheating partner's perspective - what happens when your partner finds out? What happens when someone else finds out and uses this information to blackmail you? Are you really going to be better off than you would've been making and executing an escape plan instead? Cheating almost always outs. Everyone thinks they're going to be the exception, but by definition few are. If you're unhappy in your relationship, either get all people in the relationship onboard to start addressing that, or leave. If leaving is going to create problems, prepare in advance to address those problems. IMO you'll be better off for it v. cheating.

    Open ##1161863