2026-04-19 13:08 UTC
So they actually tackle problematic issues instead of indiscriminate censorship, and that sounds like a worse alternative to you than "absolute freedom of speech in capitalist/Nazi-owned social networks"?
Replies (2)
-
@megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-04-19 16:34
They take on issues that are problematic for the party’s image, if they’re not problematic for the party they let it thrive. Outside that narrow window, china’s internet is even more of a Skinner box, addiction suck, dystopian corporate hellscape than the English speaking internet.
-
@quarkquasar@lemmy.world 2026-04-19 13:51
Listen comrade, you know China isn't some dreamland full of happy wealthy people, it's got huge numbers of poor, starving people, young people stricken with cancer, disease, bulldozers, you name it. They're ran by an uncaring party, who are turning the screws on the population who are rebelling and dying. I know you know. And now you know I know you know. Your little pink act is tired.