@catnipmedia@social.vivaldi.net
2025-12-29 13:24 UTC
@Tutanota Stop allowing children under 16 or even 18 to get access to violent, abusive or pornographic content. That is why they use words "child safety". I was adult when I saw my first terrorists cutting throat video, and those screams are still hounting me. I was almost about to faint, I was having mild panic attack. You want children get access to that? How about animal torture? Why do you want kids have access to sick content? Why word Netiquette matters nothing to some anymore...
Replies (3)
-
@thecyberwitch@mastodon.social 2025-12-29 14:01
@catnipmedia maybe be a parent to your damn kids then, and not have a bunch of homophobic misogynist pedos decide what is and isn't "safe."
-
@khleedril@cyberplace.social 2025-12-29 15:48
@catnipmedia @Tutanota Stupid and missed the point.
-
@clare_hooley@mastodon.me.uk 2025-12-29 16:16
@catnipmedia @Tutanota you can have controls on the child’s device and the home/school routers, as set up by parents/schools, not age gate (surveil, papers please) me as an adult using every safe and well-moderated user-to-user site on the internet, preventing small safe sites even existing (e.g. my running club’s forum vs forcing use of Meta cos of cost of age gating tech). Also regulate the harmful ad-driven algorithms and the moderation of the sites. 1/2