2026-04-24 15:29 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@GeekyOnion@lemmy.world 2026-04-24 16:00
Less “reduce the number,” and more “make the poor more tractable.” The rich still need human carpet to walk on, they just need it to be uneducated, fecund, and desperate to get under their feet.
-
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2026-04-24 17:00
This contradicts their insistence that children should have children to stop population decline
-
@sundray@lemmus.org 2026-04-24 18:15
To reduce the number of _non-working_ poor people. Or “useless eaters” as the psychotic, billionaire class calls them.
-
@snooggums@piefed.world 2026-04-24 16:03
Which is short sighted as a healthy populace is what lead to the US economic growth in industry prior to it being redefined as being based entirely on stock market gambling vibes. A strong and healthy populace was a big part of the post WWII boom.
-
@jaycifer@lemmy.world 2026-04-24 16:57
Is that why they’re trying to restrict birth control and sex education while saying people need to have more kids, so there will be fewer poor people?