Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Myles@poa.st

2026-09-27 14:34 UTC

Let's examine this statement and take everything at face value. Doing so is always a simple thought exercise because arabs always lie, and the Iranians are no different. Iran says it "struck" vessels traveling the southern route. There's no indication any of these ships are heavily damaged, let alone sunk. Not great, obviously, but the Battle of Midway this was not. So we have some shitskin dancing a merry jig because Iran is continuing to be a nuisance. Not a geopolitical threat. A nuisance. I can't even say "Iran is being a nuisance," because their civilian leadership is clamoring for peace! It's the IRGC that refuses to negotiate. These same third worldists will cry out of their asses about the genocide in Gaza, but when the IRGC is actively hurting not only its own civilians, but it's own troops (because they can't pay them), suddenly it's the best thing since sliced bread. Make that make sense, shitskin. Is it ok for the IRGC to hurt Iranian civilians but not ok for the US to do so? RT: https://detroitriotcity.com/objects/b4866840-2f9d-45c8-a975-dda4c634beb6

Replies (1)

  • @HighChurchBaptist@poa.st 2026-09-27 15:16

    @Myles@poa.st @admin@detroitriotcity.com There are no "honest brokers" in this conflict because every belligerent has a very obvious motivation to lie. One of the best ways to examine these kinds of claims for credibility is to ask for specific details about an alleged event. Which ships? Which aircraft? Where did they launch from? Did they have the range to get there? What weapons were used? Can the ships/aircraft/weapons be employed in the manner in which they are alleged to have been? It's more work, but it is much better to examine claims than to take government propaganda announcements or Telegram rumors ("OSINT") at face value. This is especially important when the announcement aligns with one's own biases or desires.

    Open ##4898203