2026-05-01 06:31 UTC
The only proviso might be if the posts are very old and there is clearer evidence of working against and making amends, but that feels unlikely given ramming comment likely to be referring to a recentish event...
We knew that the growth of the party under Polanski was likely to mean stuff getting missed and that this was going to be an attack vector, but when it's found something better than "no comment" is needed
#UKPol
Replies (1)
-
@penwing@wandering.shop 2026-05-01 06:36
Polanski cannot hide behind "only Jewish party leader" too much - he needs to set clear idea of what is antisemitic behaviour and where that line may differ from what the law treats as "inciting" or illegal speech. We need to see clear examples of how support for Palastine can be done while also combatting antisemitism - Starmer has done so much to cement that link, but Polanski (and the rest of us) cannot challenge it if he doesn't address the antisemitism #UKPol