2026-09-23 11:42 UTC
@arthsmn@organica.social @kde@floss.social I wrote the play by play thread that went viral. And a few days later, the KDE developers started a vote on a pro-LLM policy. And when one of the people pushing for that permissive policy was outed as someone with Nazi politics, they banned the person who brought the evidence, locked the thread, and started a new private one so that they could make that policy decision without any KDE users in the room.
EDIT: Updates! Mostly good! Although it looks like this will be a bit redundant between threads due to the asynchronous nature of the internet 😂 https://raphus.social/@MaddieM4/117320340004129375
Replies (1)
-
@kde@floss.social 2026-09-23 12:24
@MaddieM4@raphus.social @arthsmn@organica.social We're sorry you see it that way, but that is not what happened. Person A violated the internal rules of invent and was banned on the spot. Person B was banned after an investigation. The two bans were inevitable. We cannot have people violating our processes (person A) or our CoC (person B). That person A made the ban of person B happen faster? True. But person B would've been banned sooner or later regardless.