2026-04-27 13:03 UTC
This is somewhere between ’not a very compelling argument’ to ’oh ok I guess left-anarchism doesn’t exist’.
The whole thing is essentially ideology by, and as, analogy.
Cool!
Wanna try any empiricism?
Not an erudite vibes based argument?
Imagine Mastodon had a governance system where all users, admins and minorities were equally represented.
Nah, I’d rather try to imagine a goverance system where users and admins either don’t exist as seperate categories, or are as close to indistinguishable as possible.
This person defines progress as managed, fair, hierachy.
… howabout abolishing class, to the greatest extent possible?
But according to this person, my backlash to this is rooted in … property rights.
Got it.
Turbolib can’t imagine any ideology other than their own, also grass is green.
Maybe they could come by the goverance comms of dbzer0 and the rest of the flotilla, for some exposure to some other ideas?
Replies (3)
-
@HubertManne@piefed.social 2026-04-27 14:49
I never thought to express it that way but yeah I pretty much would like everything to be controllable by the individual. I get there are bad actors so having things like blocks setup by default is fine as long as the user can turn them off.
-
@eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-04-27 15:57
I stopped reading as soon as he said “you know who else liked decentralization…” Thanks for delivering the misericord.
-
@MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 2026-04-27 18:16
Yep, first thought that popped into my head after reading it was that it had big “freedom for me but not for thee” vibes. But of course their “freedom for me but not for thee” is better for everyone than the other kinds.