2026-09-16 21:38 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@JadeEast@quokk.au 2026-09-17 00:18
We’re opposites. I prefer the libre kernel and it’s not in the repo for the OS I’m using. Takes like 12 hours to compile on my 2012 laptop. I just let it run overnight when there’s an update. Been itching to throw guix on this and check it out.
-
@akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 2026-09-17 19:47
Oh shiet… well, I pray my 5800X3D survives a little longer. I’d hate to upgrade in this economy D: … I’ve had it since it came out, I think. I did have some random reboots, but that was with one of its newer (?) relatives, an AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with Radeon Graphics. And I believe it was because it had ran out of RAM and SWAP or the like… ALSO LOOK: https://www.wanture.com/tech/amd-ryzen-7-5800x3d-am4-relaunch-q2/ I just happened to come across this now. How many years later and the re-release it?! xD Hilarious…
-
@limelight79@lemmy.world 2026-09-17 23:24
I compiled my own kernel for a few years when I first started using Linux in the late 90s. “So much faster by removing things I don’t need,” I claimed. I cringe at that now. I’ve been using stock kernels for years now. Any speed improvements from a custom kernel are more than offset by the time it takes to configure and compile it. Making one mistake could wipe out years of theoretical speed improvements as you recover, reconfigure, and recompile. Plus, if you have a problem with a piece of hardware down the road, how do you know the issue isn’t your custom kernel? I’d say, do it once or twice for the experience, or if there’s some specific reason you need it (bleeding edge hardware, for example). Some years back, I realized I’d rather be using my computers instead of administering them.