2026-04-13 19:37 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@theolodis@feddit.org 2026-04-14 04:43
How do you feel about female infants getting their ears pierced? Also, removing an arm and removing some skin is really not the same. Specially considering that removing that skin has proven health benefits for the baby.
-
@snooggums@piefed.world 2026-04-13 19:51
I dislike the 'mutilated' label being applied and take it as an insult because of the negative connotations despite not personally having any downsides. It is like claiming that everyone who is overweight based on BMI is unhealthy despite many athletes having a high BMI due to having a lot of muscle. Plus the person I was responding to said adults who voluntarily chose to get circumcised are mutilated themselves. With that logic ear piercings and voluntarily removing annoying, but not medically probematic moles is mutilation. My point is that you can't just ignore the negative connotations and use a broad brush to describe people while claiming it is technically accurate. No, it should not be done to babies without a medical necessity. That doesn't mean calling everyone who has been circumcised mutilated won't come across as insulting.