2026-03-18 13:11 UTC
It's a very visual topic so using a visual medium to learn about it is ideal.
Again, I feel like it's disingenuous to compare using pixels to predict local pixels accurate to simply using a higher resolution, to generating an entirely different image every frame. One of them sounds no different than using certain filters or post process, the other sounds like slop ass AI.
Replies (2)
-
@ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2026-03-18 13:55
The problem stems from the term 'GenAI'. These systems use math to predict things. There are a lot of valid mathmatical calculations to predict out there. Rendering lighting is one of them. Human language and imagery isn't one of them, which is what idiots have been trying to funnel through these models.
-
@FishFace@piefed.social 2026-03-18 14:04
The effect looks like a filter or shader. I've seen the comparisons.