2026-10-04 05:06 UTC
Federal Judge Rules a Flock Search Was ‘Indiscriminate Mass Surveillance’ and Unconstitutional: it’s one of the first times a federal judge has decided Flock searches can be unconstitutional.
Replies (3)
-
@eicker@lemmy.world 2026-10-04 05:08
Turns out »it’s on a public road« stops being a magic privacy waiver when police can reconstruct a month of your movements with a few clicks. Flock sold dragnet surveillance as a camera network, and a federal judge finally called it what it is: indiscriminate mass surveillance.
-
@halfapage@lemmy.world 2026-10-04 07:01
while you were concerned with deep state, turns out you should have been concerned with shallow state lol
-
@mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2026-10-04 08:56
Americans will never stand up for their own privacy because the vast majority of them thinks they’re talking about OTHER people - not them. Even now, just like with the out of control law enforcement, they think somehow those cameras aren’t looking at THEM.