Replies (1)

• @phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2026-09-11 03:43

  I mean you’re the one disagreeing with most of the field without actual proof on a tiny forum instead of publishing an opinion to Nat Comm or other actual journal. You give yourself no qualifications to be someone arguing against the field. You present to an audience containing a lot of non-physicisicts (who nonetheless can follow logic) but define pretty much none of the theories you reference while still dragging this out for 30+ paragraphs. There are multiple points where you outright dismiss contrary views without reason besides “I don’t like it therefore its stupid and wrong.” I’m not sure what response you are hoping for here. Unless you have an alternative with the logic and math behind it your opinion isn’t really worth anything.

  Open ##4745078