Post #4745078 · Elektrine

@phdepressed@sh.itjust.works

2026-09-11 03:43 UTC

I mean you’re the one disagreeing with most of the field without actual proof on a tiny forum instead of publishing an opinion to Nat Comm or other actual journal. You give yourself no qualifications to be someone arguing against the field. You present to an audience containing a lot of non-physicisicts (who nonetheless can follow logic) but define pretty much none of the theories you reference while still dragging this out for 30+ paragraphs. There are multiple points where you outright dismiss contrary views without reason besides “I don’t like it therefore its stupid and wrong.” I’m not sure what response you are hoping for here. Unless you have an alternative with the logic and math behind it your opinion isn’t really worth anything.

Replies (1)

@bunchberry@lemmy.world 2026-09-11 04:16

I mean you’re the one disagreeing with most of the field Appeal to popularity. without actual proof Can you prove anything in philosophy? I mean, it’s proved to the best it can be. You of course, have to agree to some unprovable assumptions: like, “objective reality exists,” and that a physical theory should be logically consistent, so on and so forth. I cannot prove those to you. There are multiple points where you outright dismiss contrary views without reason besides “I don’t like it therefore its stupid and wrong.” Yet you don’t point to one of them where I said that. The quotation is literally a fabrication. I am hoping for someone to either point out a mistake in my reasoning, or give a stronger argument for the opposing side. But, of course, if you don’t even understand the mathematics enough to know what I am talking about, the best you can do is resort to personal attacks and appeals to popularity, or fabricate quotes to lie about what I said.

Open ##4746336