← Feed

Posts

• View post

• View post

  “Why I Built My Own Camera App (And You Should Too)” https://blog.thepixelary.com/post/810496881791811584/why-i-built-my-own-camera-app-and-you-should-too

• View post

  “Image registration based on the Fourier-Mellin transform Log-polar transform” https://sthoduka.github.io/imreg_fmt/docs/log-polar-transform/

• View post

  I've been finding a few interesting books of late... Cole M, Scribner S. Culture and Thought; a Psychological Introduction. Wiley; 1974.

• View post

  “Exposing 'faceless' YouTubers pushing Canada to join the U.S.” https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.7187429

• View post

  “Why I Built My Own Camera App: RAW Data” https://blog.thepixelary.com/post/810503615233048576/raw-data-my-first-taste-of-unprocessed-beauty

• View post

  This is absolutely the finest work ever produced on LinkedIn. Marvel in all of its #pissoncarpet glory.

• View post

  The scientism around colour is vast and expansive. Gilchrist’s quote should be enough for folks to stop and take stock of what we think we know. Gilchrist, Alan. Seeing Black and White. Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187168.001.0001.

• View post

  Hats off to jpsalas… you have made some stunning virtual pinball tables!

• View post

  I had a discussion with yet another individual who believed in “wide gamut”. It is a very simple question; should an author be able to depict rainbows, prisms, dispersion, indirect interactions of materials, etc. without a wide gamut display? The answer is *of course* of course. Rethink how we are being sold nonsense to compel us to purchase things, and focus on what a picture is as a cultural artifact. “Wide gamut” is a bogus construct, founded upon a false belief of “simulacrum”.

• View post

  Every time some grifting corporate shill talks about “AI”. Every. Time.