Elektrine lite

← Feed

rako

rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr

<p>Sur le microblogging: @rakoo@blah.rako.space<br/> Sur le web: <a href="https://www.rako.space" rel="nofollow ugc" target="_blank">https://www.rako.space</a><br/> Sur xmpp: rako@conversations.im<br/> Sur deltachat: <a href="https://i.delta.chat/#F2EACE10C8C69DE92EE5B72B308C75A6FA0B3479&amp;i=AXCOWs9ZS0ZlgudzJAm8ERqz&amp;s=WZ2khNFSyDdAW-N3yjqQTnTK&amp;a=phj2so4ey%40nine.testrun.org&amp;n=Invite" rel="nofollow ugc" target="_blank">https://i.delta.chat/#F2EACE10C8C69DE92EE5B72B308C75A6FA0B3479&amp;i=AXCOWs9ZS0ZlgudzJAm8ERqz&amp;s=WZ2khNFSyDdAW-N3yjqQTnTK&amp;a=phj2so4ey%40nine.testrun.org&amp;n=Invite</a> (si vous n’êtes pas du spam je vous ajouterai à mon vrai compte)</p>

Posts

  • View post

    [META] Should [AIP] also apply to projects not from the author ? I stumbled upon a post that tells about a project not by the author, and the project has signs of AI. The post is clearly saying the project is good, so I interpreted it as a promotion, but maybe I am wrong. Should that kind of post still be marked as [AIP] ? The post is https://lemmy.world/post/52316345

  • View post

    We can see a globally slowly downward trend, probably not good but I’m definitely not equipped to analyze that

  • View post

    A more interesting way is to understand that there is a difference between what is and how it affects us. The point isn’t so much to decide whether gravity exists or not but to make sure it doesn’t impose any unfair weight (ha) on some members of the society and not others. When we say “it’s just exists” we’re very close to say “there’s nothing we can do about this” and that justifies unfair situations.

  • View post

    Note: il est possible d’envoyer un commentaire en citant la commu, @cestdelamiarde@tarte.nuage-libre.fr