porcoesphino
porcoesphino@mander.xyz
Posts
-
View post
Agreed, but I think a framing or two is missing here, and it only applies to a subset, is that the people of the world shouldn't have to deal with more/larger bot nets because these things haven't been considered. Another is just that the average great aunt isn't *opting into a concept of insecurity* they're simply ignorant to what threats there are. If it's possible to distinguish between the two sets of people, or to maybe even bucket devices by potential threat, it might...
-
View post
I can't believe this is so heavily downvoted for pointing out flaws in the expressed/written stance while still expressing they agree with the general position
-
View post
> For each statement, between 25% and 32% of respondents said they believed it, and another sizeable percentage (17–39%) said they didn’t know whether it was true. In total, 70% of respondents believed at least one of the claims (see ‘Divided views’). The findings, which have not been peer reviewed and were published today by the Edelman Trust Institute in New York City, were described as ‘staggering’ in an accompanying article by the think tank’s chief executive, Richard Edelman.  and something needs to kickstart that for their recycling, government stepping in to start that loop isn't uncommon or as terrible as you seem to be making it out
-
View post
> Any time I want to know if a linux command exists to manipulate data This is one of the reasons I'm very cautious of my genAI use. Most of the time I got to the stage where I thought "there should be a command / way to do this" and I asked an LLM it would tell me the intuitive interface that I expected existed. But when I tested it didn't exist, the answer had just been creative writing