← Feed

Posts

• View post

  @falcennial let's hope a) doesn't become true, like if the AI companies (intentionaly) build in commercials and/or political propaganda.

• View post

  Det var vist en deler Jeg kan godt lide ordet "sykophantic" - at det bliver oversat til "slesk" gør det bare bedre. 😄 #ai https://www.copenhagen-review-of-communication.com/vi-ved-alle-at-ai-er-mega-slesk-men-hvor-slesk-og-hvordan-slesk/

• View post

  #bornhack evening walk... This is the radio studio by night

• View post

  This makes me happy #bornhack

• View post

  #AI ftw. I am testing #opencode. The more I test AI tools, the less I trust them, and the less I use them. If only search engines were as good as when google started out, most of my LLM usage would disappear.

• View post

  I am looking into #sre (site reliability engineering) again. Google published some nice books on the topic 10 years ago. That is a long time in tech. https://sre.google/resources/ Do you have any newer book recommendations on the topic? #books #sysadmin

• View post

  I think it is nice of #github to be down from time to time, and include #copilot, so we can get a feel for how dependent we are. "Thanks" github and a link for ref https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/

• View post

  Der er stor forskel på at man bruger #LLM til at gennemlæse readme filerne, og på at få #openclaw til at køre dit liv. Det virker lidt på debatten, som om man glemmer det. Jeg sidder et sted hvor ting skal virke, og kunne vedligeholdes og udviddes på en kontrollet måde. Skal AI lave ændringer i prod? nej, men det skal mennesker heller ikke. Det er derfor vi har en pipeline med masser af tests før deployment. Vi skal måske mere have en snak om hvor modne systemerne er.

• View post

  I am trying to make some tests mandatory in #github #actions before merge is allowed. In #gitlab, it would be "does pipeline succeed or not". In github, I must specify which job that must succeed. This is an issue, since the repo includes multiple deployments and hence different test jobs. Seems that the solution is to make a master pipeline that combines all options, and then have a check job that evaluates if the combination of changed files and job successes means that eve...

• View post

  Jeg sidder lige og læser lidt fra #punktumdk og prøver at forstå hvad det er de skriver. Noget med at jeg skal finde en forhandler for at jeg kan have mine .dk domæner. Er der en liste et sted? Det virker som en standard øvelse i at lave ting mindre transparent, så man kan gøre det dyrere. Men ok, der er jo vigtigt at "øge indsatsen for internetsikkerheden. "

• View post

  Guess I have to expect phishing related to udemy also. https://haveibeenpwned.com/Breach/Udemy #haveibeenpwned

• View post

  Dykpumpen til nedsivningsanlæget har en fejl. Jeg tror den er væltet. Vi har haft lidt problemer for nyligt, så vi har en robust plan B. Det er den gule slange, ledningen og den hvide træksnor. Og dykpumpe #2 som man ikke kan se. Jeg har ikke er billede af "vand" der går op til 10cm fra låget. Det må i tænke jer til. Og lugten... Den er landlig. Ligesom når naboen hælder fylde på marken. Er der nok byboere på linjen til at jeg burde putte denne slags bag CW? 🤔 #farmlife

• View post

  I am looking for statistics or other resources that describe how much power or CPU cycles #AI and #LLM is using compared to a similar task performed by a regular script or program. Anyone having seen such comparisons?

• View post

  I am struggling a bit with #githubactions. I want to be able to click "merge when checks pass", that requires that I specify which checks that must pass. These checks are by workflow. I build and test multiple docker containers, and have a workflow for each. Making a workflow that includes everything is an option. Must I make a master workflow? there a trick to specifying check by name? I get the sense that my thinking is wrong about how to structure github actions.... #git...