Kyle
kyle@mastodon.kylemacquarrie.co.uk
<p>Front-end dev from Glasgow, keen on CSS, cycling and heavy metal. Endorse me for javascript fuckery on LinkedIn.</p>
Posts
-
View post
@b0rk IME it&#39;s almost invariably the front-end team implementing, based on loading the marketing team&#39;s pile of 3rd party tracking scripts and seeing what doesn&#39;t load
-
View post
@b0rk definitely not a recurring sore point ๐
-
View post
@sue also we&#39;d catch a lot of problems if people did read their compiler output ๐
-
View post
@acf yeah there&#39;s some weird shit you can do
-
View post
@rem
-
View post
@phooky I worked on a project for a client that revolved around Wang Annotations last year, although in fairness that was probably the least cursed part of it.
-
View post
@jonikorpi Astro if you want an all-in-one solution or Eleventy if you want maximum control and are happy plugging a lot of bits together to get there. (I voted Astro)
-
View post
@sil if you wrap the curly braces in regular parentheses it might work with the implicit return?
-
View post
@sil plain brackets should (although the explicit return is probably more readable anyway ๐ ) m.map(item =&gt; ({thing: item, punc: &quot;!&quot;}))
-
View post
@sil yeah it gets cryptic quickly
-
View post
@anatudor all black for me in Safari 26.2 on macOS 15.7.3
-
View post
@beep adding lolsob as a custom emoji to my work Slack is probably the single most impactful thing I&#39;ve done there in four years
-
View post
@semanticist it&#39;s been a while since I&#39;ve used one but I think they might not play well with responsive layouts, and they&#39;re fiddly to author. Bandcamp still uses them in production though (on desktop only) so they&#39;re not totally dead. SVGs are nicer but probably even fiddlier if you&#39;re not used to working with them.
-
View post
@zachleat you may not like it but this is what peak performance looks like
-
View post
@acf I feel like I have a concussion just watching it
-
View post
@acf yeah last week everything was hitting 100%, this week 98% isn&#39;t cutting it