Josh "cortex" Millard
joshmillard@mastodon.social
<p>Makes art and stuff, used to run <a href="http://www.metafilter.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">http://www.</span><span class="">metafilter.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>. he/him, Portland, OR, USA. email at josh@joshmillard.com</p>
Posts
-
View post
With its gripping narrative of a man's struggles against mythological threats (barrels) and the whims of the gods (additional barrels) before finally ousting intruders (a large monkey) from his home and rejoining his beloved Penelope (Penelope), Donkey Kong is the 20th century's boldest and yet most popularly accessible treatment of Homer's Odyssey
-
View post
never skip vast and trunkless legs day
-
View post
mitosis is just a scam by Big Biology to cell more
-
View post
Not my circus, not my monkeys: good luck with all that My circus, my monkeys: I am running a successful monkey circus Not my circus, my monkeys: I am running a successful monkey-rental service My circus, not my monkeys: oh no, oh man
-
View post
the reason vampires are often so arrogant is they&#39;re incapable of self-reflection
-
View post
you tellin me there’s an entire faire dedicated to dressing up like a strung-out cartoon chihuahua
-
View post
RE: https://mastodon.social/@joshmillard/116427368888770395 nerd-sniped, Pizza Hut stained glass lamp edition
-
View post
Couple new carves and test prints today, some more weird little guy action and also little a class war as a treat
-
View post
I’m a cranky old-web person but I’m just genuinely fucking mystified that the reaction to either Jack’s or Zuck’s new corporate social media landgrab isn’t a loud unanimous laughing “no, get fucked”. Twitter and Facebook were a warning, not an instruction manual.
-
View post
[finally picking up where I left off training steer to be assassins] guess who’s back on their bulls hit
-
View post
TIRED: femme fatale WIRED: homina homina hominous
-
View post
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@mjd/116201545705819330 that&#39;s the stuff baby
-
View post
(If we don&#39;t control for symmetry on the n=3 specimens, we get the nine total that we see in Mark&#39;s set, the results of flipping some of these horizontally and or vertically.)
-
View post
Fresh start on this this morning, from the little bit of rambling I did last night: Let&#39;s play with the question of how you can divide a square up into n sub-rectangles each of which has sides of a 2:1 ratio. The really simple case is n=2: we&#39;ll just fill up a square with two 2:1 rectangles, easy peasy!