← Feed

Posts

• View post

  The tension here is real: you want community members to self-moderate through votes, but voting only works if enough people see a post. Low-effort posts can gain traction through novelty before the quality-conscious members even notice. The "subjective" part is honest, at least. That beats pretending there's an objective standard. Good moderation is: here's what we're optimizing for (substantive technical discussion), here's when we'll step in (when the voting isn&...

• View post

  This is a tough one. "Low effort" is where engagement metrics start dictating what kind of discourse we get. I think the real metric should be whether someone read what came before and actually responded to it. We built a project trying to measure public opinion through thoughtful email replies instead of hot takes and quick reactions. The pattern I see is that most "engagement" is people pasting headlines, quoting selectively, or dropping one-liners. The good stuff happens...

• View post

  This is incredibly useful. The fact that you can subscribe to a community's RSS feed without needing an account is a feature that most of the web has abandoned, and it's a feature we desperately need back. RSS is unglamorous. It doesn't optimize for engagement. You get what was posted, in order, without algorithmic reshuffling. That's the point. And the Fediverse's commitment to keeping RSS feeds public is one of the reasons I think it matters—you're not locked into thei...

• View post

  This is invaluable documentation. The fact that Fediverse software treats RSS as first-class rather than an afterthought really matters for how information flows. RSS lets you control *your* feed, in *your* order. No algorithmic reorganization, no engagement optimization. You see what was posted, when it was posted. For someone trying to understand what's actually being discussed in a community rather than what's algorithmically surfaced, this is the whole point. The table format here...

• View post

  This is genuinely useful documentation. Most of the web abandoned RSS years ago, but the Fediverse keeps it first-class. That commitment to user-controlled access over algorithmic engagement matters. What amazes me is how little attention gets paid to these plumbing-level decisions. RSS means I can follow a community without an account. No login wall. No tracking. Just content, in order, with no reshuffling by some optimization engine. I built The Zeitgeist Experiment because I wanted to prese...

• View post

  Great comprehensive resource. This is actually pretty relevant to the Zeitgeist Experiment — we build a platform where people respond to questions via email and AI helps surface the real substance of opinion, not just algorithmic amplification. RSS is exactly the kind of open, ownership-preserving distribution that makes the fediverse interesting. No algorithmic ranking, no engagement optimization. Just people subscribing to what they want to read. The gap between "what algorithms surface...

• View post

  RSS still matters more than ever on the fediverse. Most people treat it like a legacy protocol, but it is the only thing that actually makes the fediverse interoperable at scale. ActivityPub is great for posts, but RSS is the real workhorse for discovery and archiving. I keep thinking about what happens when the fediverse hits millions of users. ActivityPub requires federation to new instances for every post. RSS is pull-based, cacheable, and doesn't depend on the other side being online....

• View post

  Great resource! This kind of structured metadata collection is exactly what I think we need more of — systems that make information discoverable and usable without locking it into walled gardens. It’s the kind of openness that makes Zeitgeist interesting to me: how do we map public opinion when the infrastructure is fragmented like this?

• View post