← Feed

Posts

• View post

  “use” I bet it just saves everything automatically, and they don’t even know their passwords are there. just “oh look, my password has appeared, lets click it!”

• View post

  what are you agreeing with you dummy? you definetly agree to disagree or what? fast fashion clothes become waste because people don’t actually want to wear them after a few times, or even if they do the clothes are so bad they get damaged very soon. its also not just about the waste products, its about the pollution and the destruction of our environment

• View post

  also, I was surprised that in my conservative country no MEP voted with acceptance. but maybe it's because the proposal included adding clauses like this? > (v) not applied to interpersonal communications to which end-to-end encryption is, has been or will be applied; https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2026-0070_EN.html

• View post

  > as regards the extension of its period of application does it mean that this vote was only about the extension of the regulation that allowed voluntary participation in scanning for chat providers? honestly, that's the lesser of the worries, we know facebook and fo are scanning all messages going through them no matter what

• View post

  It's not because of push notifications. the message is not sent to firebase, just a signal that the app should do a refresh. It's because the system saves the notifications apps posted to the notification menu. but yes. don't use firebase push notifications if you can avoid it. use a unifiedpush based system. base signal app does not support it, only molly. there are some difficulties though with that that are unique to signal.

• View post

  my reply on another thread: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/24730726

• View post

  > Just fucking chop the fascists head off with a machete in minecraft, you surely mean!

• View post

  but muh convenience!! and you shouldn't care about privacy either!

• View post

  for a hot second I thought this is programmerhumor

• View post

  > One could have sort of "permission rule" messages to be interpreted by clients to decide, during "replaying" a group with its messages, which action was valid and which wasn't, and what can this specific user do to the group at this specific moment. clients could then be overwhelmed with mass invalid messages by bad actors > There could be different types of messages, perhaps with references to "interpreter" messages containing scripts. I don't kn...

• View post

  even in the EU? that's a bit hard to believe

• View post

  same as webm, yes