Elektrine lite

← Feed

@rozodru@piefed.world

2026-09-10 13:21 UTC

AI is a tool, like a hammer, and should be used as such. And like a tool should require training. The problem is people aren’t using it as a tool and rather look at the hammer and say “go build me a house”. That’s where the issue is. Does a hammer know how to build a house on its own? no. does AI excel at end to end builds? no. but people are using it for said end to end builds. Devs, vibe coders, god knows who else still to this day fail to understand that AI doesn’t understand how to build things correctly. All the agents care about is getting to a solution as quickly as possible to retain a userbase. that’s it. will what ever it builds scale? no. will it be full of exploits? very likely. will it be able to refactor whatever it wrote? no because it will believe YOU wrote it. so upgrades/improvements to whatever are virtually impossible. THEN you combine all that with the fact that EVERY AI’s training data, currently, is incredibly out of date. Tech moves too fast for it. So you have people building shit with libraries and what have you that are already out of date and they don’t know that.

Replies (1)

  • @qyron@sopuli.xyz 2026-09-10 14:33

    A tool built through nefarious means and consuming resources it should never had chanelled into it. Then, taking from your words, if the information these machines are working is by default outdated, why insist in feeding it with more and more and expect different outcomes? Makes no sense to begin with.

    Open ##4748550