Replies (2)

• @tourist@lemmy.world 2026-04-11 00:59

  Muddy waters here From what I've gathered 1. **There may be photos being released soon**, and her legal team is trying to preempt it by denying it. _idk how law works, but I don't know what preempting it is meant to do_ --- 2. **there is supposedly a (plausibly deepfaked) image floating around the boomer side of the internet:** _I haven't seen it nor tried to find it. Last time I checked Facebook, I learned several horrific slurs for ethnic groups I did not even know existed_ --- 3. **Maybe, she finally caught wind of her name being mentioned alongside Epstein** _I've met people who just check the news and/or the internet once per year, if ever_ --- 4. **Some other Trump administration political strategy** _I'm legit not intelligent enough to understand nor recall the explanation there_ --- Probably a legal thing. Photos/Documents may be releasing soon If not, yeah... Just more bizarre Like if I announced: > "I did not rinse my unwashed genitals in the spahetti after I cooked it" In the middle of a family dinner.

  Open ##1079819

• @CountVon@sh.itjust.works 2026-04-11 00:54

  No one knows what story she's denying, or what images she's claiming are fake. The most likely possibility is that someone is *preparing* to release a story on the links between her and Epstein. It's standard practice in journalism to contact the subject of a piece, inform them of the contents of that piece, and offer them an opportunity to comment. A request for comment on an upcoming story seems a likely trigger for this reaction. The entire speech strikes me as a thinly veiled threat, essentially saying "If you publish your story I will sue you for defamation."

  Open ##1079820