2026-09-15 10:38 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@harib_murshidi@mastodon.social 2026-09-15 10:52
@nixCraft@mastodon.social I have only one little issue with them that sometimes it's bloody difficult to find something there on their website and you keep searching using different keywords and you still end up with nothing 😐
-
@Pizzasquidwithatophat@mastodon.social 2026-09-15 11:40
@nixCraft@mastodon.social Not pipepipe...
-
@archivescribe@mastodon.social 2026-09-15 13:10
@nixCraft@mastodon.social Unless I'm writing it, I just assume all of it is AI-assisted/generated. And by assuming that, I know I'm probably right.
-
@naught101@mastodon.social 2026-09-15 13:18
@nixCraft@mastodon.social so.. Seems like we're beyond dead internet theory, and into dead software theory? Depressing.
-
@_RyekDarkener_@mastodon.social 2026-09-15 13:21
@nixCraft@mastodon.social Honestly: If the app works, does not trace or hurt me, AND a competent human has proofread and committed it and takes responsibility for the piece of work, I’m fine.
-
@compoundlabs@mastodon.social 2026-09-15 17:09
@nixCraft@mastodon.social A clean build from a committed tree proves reproducibility, not authorship. I'd check commit history and issue responses before treating code style as evidence.
-
@xeroseneisdead@mastodon.social 2026-09-19 10:35
@nixCraft@mastodon.social dude for real... but the real human art now has more value. Also as AI seems to get sneakier [alledgedly if its not mostly all just for show, to sway the masses] i would begin to trust human made and audited software.. But really. Man made shit now has authenticity.. that makes it even better... Can there be some way of signing a file that verifies youre human? Like a dna based signature or some shit that re compiles from your fingertip prick every time you sign? Invisi watermark