Elektrine lite

← Feed

@ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online

2026-04-24 19:59 UTC

It is insane to think that he is endorsing a theory that was widely rejected even by Miasma guys in the 19th century. The miasma advocates were wrong, but they still did many things that were beneficial. The first water treatment plants that provided the first safe drinking water were advocated for by miasma advocates, and the London sewer system, one that is still being used today was also built by them. Terrain theory? They did jack shit. Just a bunch of crazy nuts who rejected both miasma and germ theory in the late 19th century.

Replies (1)

  • @leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-04-25 07:03

    To be fair, miasma theory made sense and was completely logical, before microscopes. They knew about actual lethal gases, and ones that had different effects on the body. They knew there were gases they couldn't yet detect, as they were still discovering new ones. They knew rotting stuff produced all kind of gases and stenchs. Hell, the theory is still pretty much valid for radon, though for reasons they couldn't have possibly imagined. And at the same time, the idea that animals could get small enough to be invisible, and to invade the human body, was absurd. It came as quite a surprise when the microscope was invented and every single drop of water turned out to be a whole ecosystem teeming with life, and we turned out to be precariously balanced colonies of microscopic cells, also inhabited by a whole bacterial ecosystem teeming with both friends and foes. And then came viruses, which are downright absurd to the point that we're still figuring out where they fit in the tree of life, and whether they're alive or not. And prions, which are the stuff of horror science fiction yet completely logical when you think about how proteins work, and how easily they might sometimes not. Miasma theory wasn't correct, sure, but it was definitely simpler, and made much more sense than the mess reality turned out to be.

    Open ##2147353