2026-02-10 13:15 UTC
@beep@follow.ethanmarcotte.com @magichopi@mastodon.green That article bugs me deeply because it still signals to bosses that they can get “efficiencies” even if it burns people out. But it doesn’t define what productivity means, or how they measure it, or how accurate any of the outputs were, or even what work these people are having it do. What jobs were these? What responsibilities? But toss some care-crumbs to your burnouts and it’ll be fine.
Feels like a head-fake.
Replies (1)
-
@beep@follow.ethanmarcotte.com 2026-02-10 13:35
@andrewhinton@jawns.club Yeah, extremely fair point. I read it as having some limitations to how far the critique would go, given the source.