2026-09-29 12:36 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2026-09-29 12:40
I implied you were neither of those things - I just quite openly called you a shill. Perhaps you should ask an AI for tips on improving your reading comprehension?
-
@Feyd@programming.dev 2026-09-29 12:56
Y’all have been saying “the problem is you’re not using the newest model/harness” to any criticism for 3 years now lol
-
@FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 2026-09-29 13:07
I think the truth is somewhere in the middle, but I could be wrong. I work in a non-programming technical field and I am also impressed and concerned by the progress the models have made over the last few years, especially in terms of being able to “do my job”. Like the other guy was saying, there are still issues with its implementations, and the second you begin to think it’s perfect or immutable, you notice issues that would have been show stoppers if they made it through. And at the end of the day, at least for what I do, if nobody is here to press the buttons, the AI will never be able to do its thing to begin with. I also personally predict that the cost of tokens and utilizing AI services will eventually become overly expensive and encumbered, as does everything under capitalism. Name one thing that hasn’t gotten shittier and more expensive overall. The AI companies haven’t even begun to enter their enshittification stage yet. I maintain that AI in its current form will NOT be able to produce truly novel thought or original work, as it can only put together the Legos that it already has ingested. Perhaps grunt work programming will require less manpower, but cutting-edge developments are still beyond the LLM’s grasp at the moment. Anyways, I welcome other opinions