Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Sunflier@lemmy.world

2026-08-31 21:35 UTC

Trump’s ballroom construction ‘likely unlawful,’ John Roberts says A 5-4 conservative majority on the Supreme Court ruled Monday that construction on a new $400 million White House ballroom can proceed, reversing lower court orders that had temporarily halted aboveground work on the project. Chief Justice John Roberts dissented from the decision, writing that the ongoing construction was “likely unlawful.” Roberts joined the court’s three liberal justices in opposition, arguing that work on the facility had moved forward unchecked for nearly a year despite significant legal flaws. “Construction of the ballroom has proceeded apace for the better part of a year,” Roberts wrote. “That construction is likely unlawful.” Despite Roberts’ warning, the majority threw out the challenge against the Trump administration on procedural grounds. The court concluded that the plaintiff, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, lacked the legal standing required to pursue a federal lawsuit. Thrown out b/c a lack of standing. Hard to imagine who would have standing beyond Congress, but we know the party in charge doesn’t care. Feels like we’re just going to have to take it. Hey, that’s probably what a rape victim thinks half way through being raped. Wow, Republicans are very pro-rape: of children, especially it seems.

Replies (3)

  • @leadore@lemmy.world 2026-08-31 22:54

    “Likely unlawful?” Isn’t it literally your job to have the final say on whether it’s unlawful? If you found it unlawful, then say so!

    Open ##4644104

  • Hey 5 court justices, please fucking tell me how the non-profit organization founded by a act of Congress with the express mission to preserve historic buildings in the US doesn’t have standing in a case regarding the destruction of a historic building in the US?

    Open ##4645484

  • @turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 2026-09-01 00:18

    Look at Roberts “moderating” the court.

    Open ##4649681