Elektrine lite

← Feed

@zloubida@sh.itjust.works

2026-03-30 04:45 UTC

A society should always prioritize its weaker members. Children are among these. The flexibility given to the parents is not a gift to the parents, but to the children.

Replies (7)

  • @orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-03-30 04:52

    Why not both? I chose not to have kids because I think this world is idiotic and don’t want more unnecessary suffering.

    Open ##1358627

  • @IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 2026-03-30 05:17

    Regrettably, this focused flexibility has an unintended side effect. It makes people with children less desirable in the job market. If it is a universal right, then it has the effect of pulling those with kids into parity with the non parents.

    Open ##1358635

  • @Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 2026-03-30 05:40

    That’s it! I’m taking “smoke breaks” every hour for my health…

    Open ##1358638

  • @jaybone@lemmy.zip 2026-03-30 06:05

    Good thing our benevolent overlords grant us such gracious “gifts” 👌🏼🍆

    Open ##1358644

  • @Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-03-30 06:44

    From each according to there ability, To each according to there need. People with children need more from society, as long as those people are also contributing as much as they are able, they deserve to have that need me

    Open ##1358651

  • @M137@lemmy.world 2026-03-30 07:06

    Many who don’t have children are among its “weaker” members. Flexibility and being treated well should be a cornerstone of society no matter if you have kids or not, especially now when the vast majority are having a hard enough time.

    Open ##1358659

  • @SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2026-03-30 14:54

    Some people dont have children, but look after grandparents, or a chronically ill or handicapped person, or they take on a lot of responsibilities in the community. Its very rare and not normal for people not to be involved in their community.

    Open ##1358748