2026-04-25 22:09 UTC
Replies (6)
-
@nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 2026-04-26 01:54
I get the issues with image generation and using text generation in scams etc. but as a professional coding tool (not just vibe coding slop) AI can be extremely helpful certain tasks, and this use case, where organizations just don't have the resources to have a security expert pore through millions of lines of code for bugs, is a net positive. I think this is a case of "don't throw the baby out with the bathwater" we can absolutely still criticize the industry and specific companies for IP, societal, and environmental concerns but lets not turn away a win just because they're causing harm elsewhere.
-
@FaceDeer@fedia.io 2026-04-26 01:33
The AI will exist either way, and people who use that AI will discover these exploits with it. I'd rather it be Mozilla.
-
@viov@lemmy.world 2026-04-25 23:00
That's why Servo and Ladybird need to be vastly built up
-
@kungen@feddit.nu 2026-04-26 00:09
Hopefully not, but it makes you wonder how many vulnerabilities they might be introducing by fixing others...
-
@redsand@infosec.pub 2026-04-27 05:33
I like to think of it as exploit mining or smarter fuzzing and auto chaining. Unlike most of the bullshit uses for AI a high false positive rate really doesn't matter. A shell is a shell and sorting through a haystack is easier than baling it then sorting through it.
-
@cadekat@pawb.social 2026-04-26 06:12
What are they doing with cryptocurrency now?