2026-09-07 07:49 UTC
I'm a queer trans woman with rather fringe politics, and these dickheads are suggesting I should filter my expression through a statistically bland language system. I put a lot of effort into what I write, and trying to express myself. It's not fast, I often struggle with language for various reasons, but I'm happy to take the time thinking and rewriting things
Suggesting I run this through an LLM is suggesting that my ideas need to be made more bland. Do LLMs seem like they're useful for trying to explain the patriarchal aspects of applying binary sex to individuals? Or making "as the actress said to the bishop" jokes that only work if the actress has a dick? Or working the word cunt into every toot?
I want to express myself, not say something that is considered plausible based on everything else written
I actually think the suggestion is rather ableist; people saying our expression is less valuable than conforming to ideas of proper language and helping a capitalist, fascist enterprise. And fuck that. If you want to rot your brain with LLMs have fun, but don't suggest i do it, or suggest this is an appropriate way we try to include disabled people in society
#Disability #LLM
Replies (1)
-
@Dangerous_beans@aus.social 2026-09-25 04:25
I wonder about the demographics of the "LLMs are good accessibility tools" crowd. I've mostly seen that from white dudes, and it feels like the whole supporting white supremacy in exchange for scraps thing that we've seen a lot throughout history It provides "AI" fans an argument that is hard to rebut and serves as a good distraction from all the other bullshit here. Of course using disabled people to score rhetorical points is not a good look