2026-09-17 19:26 UTC
But then why ban Macklemore unless he suspected Macklemore would’ve gone on a political rant?
Regardless, not using your platform to advocate for people without a platform is a form of complicity.
Replies (1)
-
@Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2026-09-18 16:18
But then why ban Macklemore unless he suspected Macklemore would’ve gone on a political rant? He wasn’t banned ahead of going on a “political rant”, he was removed after. So I don’t know what you’re on about there. Regardless, not using your platform to advocate for people without a platform is a form of complicity. That is highly debatable. I heard no one go on a “political rant” about the various internal conflicts in Africa. Are they complicit in those because of that? If an artist just wants to do their art. I say fair enough. I strongly disagree that it’s a form of complicity