Post #1871985 · Elektrine

2026-04-26 21:08 UTC

>As part of our continued collaboration with Anthropic Anthropic is literally the one that refused to let them make [autonomous weapons with their AI](https://www.reuters.com/business/pentagon-clashes-with-anthropic-over-military-ai-use-2026-01-29/). There is a whole [wikipedia page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic%E2%80%93United_States_Department_of_Defense_dispute) about it. They explicitly [don't want their AI used for weapons](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74721xyd1wo). Of course, that wouldn't stop governments/militaries from doing so anyway. It would be different if Mozilla was working with OpenAI, but of the two Anthropic is currently the better one. And yes, the AI is out of the box. Just like once nuclear warheads were created, there is no going back.

Replies (1)

@XLE@piefed.social 2026-04-27 02:58

> They explicitly don't want their AI used for weapons. This is a blatant lie, unsupported by your source. Because they explicitly do. In Dario's own bloodthirsty words: > Our strong preference is to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters. [Don't believe and regurgitate these lies about "red lines"](https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/02/openais-red-lines-are-written-in-the-nsas-dictionary-where-words-mean-what-the-nsa-wants-them-to-mean/) when they are worse than meaningless. Dario practically salivates with the desire to build weapons with their AI. They provided the AI for bombing Venezuelan boats, they provided the AI for killing Iranian children. Your own article says he works with Palantir. He is a child murderer and you don't need to whitewash him.

Open ##1871986