2026-02-09 22:16 UTC
@Herndonite@mastodon.online framing it as anything other than "ice can see through ring cameras" is softening it, and 100% of the time some rando responds to a thread with nothing but a link to a snopes link, it implies they are "calling bullshit".
so if i say "ring can see through ice cameras" and you reply with nothing but a link to a snopes article, it implies you are calling bullshit on my statement.
which in this context means you are defending ring and ice from me.
Replies (1)
-
@Herndonite@mastodon.online 2026-02-09 22:29
@Viss@mastodon.social Sorry. I don't know you and I hadn't heard of this connection between ICE and Ring, so I sought out more information. Your post didn't offer any information to back up the Ring/ICE connection ( though you may have in previous posts -- I should have checked) so I after reading the Snopes item which raised plenty of red flags, I linked to it in my reply. Perhaps I should have added more context in doing that, so apologize if I offended you.