2026-09-02 19:42 UTC
It makes no sense to spend on both parties. They would get more corporate welfare if they spent for Republicans every time.
And why would Democrats participate in such a conspiracy willingly? You really believe that none of them would spill the beans? It’s just not realistic.
Replies (3)
-
@Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-09-03 06:44
What a silly take. It’s a two party system. They buy both parties. It’s bleedingly obvious that they do this, it’s literally what PACs are
-
@crispbacon99@lemmy.zip 2026-09-02 20:41
What do you mean spill the beans, it’s all public on who receives pac funding and which ones. There is no beans to spill you can just look it up on opensecrets.org. Democrats like Jeffries and Schumer are prime examples of Democrats on a leash held by Israel’s Netanyahu. Hell, most of the Republicans seem compromised and don’t even get started on the odd connections with Epstein and the president
-
@Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2026-09-02 21:20
There is literally proof they do spend it on both parties. Why the fuck wouldn’t they?