2026-10-02 09:03 UTC
Why not just do 2026.10 then?
Replies (2)
-
@MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2026-10-02 09:20
Because it’s clearly not 1926 and it likely will not be around in 2126.
-
@Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-10-02 09:20
Type less numbers. Or one would name versions by their compilation timestamp. You wouldn’t want 20261002112036.