@PaniczGodek@functional.cafe What you call ‘disagreement’ was merely this jackass looking for talking points to torpedo the paper. Which was not written for the journal system, but he showed what would happen if it were. He did not hold back on looking for ad hominem attacks that were complete irrelevancies. And he actually, literally claimed I had assumed symbols on paper were moving faster than light. The whole paper was about symbols and symbolic operations, and he claimed I assumed FTL motion.