Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz

2026-08-29 01:54 UTC

The team achieved 10 times better performance than GNSS systems, with a one nautical mile of positioning accuracy. Variation up to a full nautical mile doesn’t seem very accurate?

Replies (4)

  • @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-08-29 02:39

    That’s comparable to what a skilled navigator can do with a sextant and chronometer. That’s more than enough accuracy to cross the ocean and get close enough to the port that you can see it.

    Open ##4621842

  • @Deebster@infosec.pub 2026-08-29 02:16

    The only thing I can think is that they’re comparing with a single system (e.g. GPS or BeiDou), even though GNSS receivers will combine all four systems to get very high accuracy (a few metres).

    Open ##4622327

  • @Gsus4@mander.xyz 2026-08-29 02:10

    this article is better written: science.report/…/quantum-gravimeter-demonstrates-… it maintained bounded position accuracy within 1 nautical mile over an 83-kilometer trajectory. This performance, achieved without access to satellite navigation, represents a more than tenfold improvement over standard navigation-grade inertial backup systems under similar conditions.

    Open ##4623351

  • @hasnep@lemmy.ml 2026-08-29 06:22

    If I were in the middle of the ocean I couldn’t find my location within 100 nautical miles without GPS so I’m pretty impressed

    Open ##4624417