2026-09-15 23:34 UTC
Hmm you could very well be right. I guess I’m being to reasonable by knowing new rust code is not automatically (and not usually) more secure then old c battle tested c code. Shareholders and CEOs don’t understand that, I wouldn’t be surprised if someone’s been convinced rust is axiomatically more secure and bankrolling the migration over it
Replies (2)
-
@TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 2026-09-15 23:42
I think that aligns with the deployment strategy right? They are targeting 27 which is the middle release and not LTS. Get some mileage on it prior to 28 LTS.
-
@Auli@lemmy.ca 2026-09-16 17:06
The otherside is just because code is old doesn’t mean its battle tested and doesn’t have bugs.