Elektrine lite

← Feed

@cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

2026-09-08 08:15 UTC

isn’t that similar to gpl? That is correct. GPL has the same problem. why should the company’s profit go to a developer they don’t employ? I dont agree with the idea that paying non-employees is a foreign concept. Many companies pay, for example, Adobe for Adobe suite software, or Google for Google suite software, despite not hiring them as employees. They pay rent to property owners despite not hiring them as employees. The idea that only employees must be paid is unfounded.

Replies (1)

  • @KullumDaue@lemmy.world 2026-09-08 11:11

    open source is free, as in freedom. you want an open source license that: forces you to share the code, even when it is not deployed (playing around at coding? share everything, to whom? don’t care, share you mfker!!!). forces you to pay a tithe to the developer.

    Open ##4647918